Résumé
Recent advances in economic theory, largely motivated by experimental findings, have led to the adoption of models of human behavior where decision-makers take into consideration not only their own payoff but also others’ payoffs and any potential consequences of these payoffs. Investigations of deontological motivations, where decision-makers make their choice based on not only the consequences of a decision but also the decision per se, have been rare. We provide a formal interpretation of major moral philosophies and a revealed preference method to distinguish the presence of deontological motivations from a purely consequentialist decision-maker whose preferences satisfy first-order stochastic dominance.
Remplace
Daniel L. Chen et Martin Schonger, « Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations », TSE Working Paper, n° 16-714, octobre 2016, révision février 2020.
Référence
Daniel L. Chen et Martin Schonger, « Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations », Science Advances, vol. 8, n° 19, mai 2022.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
Science Advances, vol. 8, n° 19, mai 2022