Abstract
While the adverse climate and health impacts of the Western diet have been demonstrated, the place of fish/seafood in climate-friendly and healthy diets is unclear. We tackle that question with a model simulating how a rational consumer urged to consume more fish would modify his diet. Those adjustments are translated into health outcomes by an epidemiological model and climate outcomes using life-cycle analysis coefficients. The application to France and Finland compares the impacts of promoting fish consumption to those of urging consumers to decrease their consumption of meat. For the same relative change, raising fish consumption generates more health benefits than decreasing meat consumption, and produces climate benefits as well. Promoting fish consumption is also highly cost-effective and should be prioritized over measures targeting meat consumption. Rather than stigmatizing meat consumers, climate-friendly and healthy diet recommendations may more effectively send a positive message urging citizens to consume more fish.
Keywords
Diet; greenhouse gas emissions; consumption; sustainability; cost-effectiveness; cost-benefit; food choices; healthy eating; demand system;
JEL codes
- D12: Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
- I12: Health Production
- Q22: Fishery • Aquaculture
- Q54: Climate • Natural Disasters • Global Warming
Reference
Xavier Irz, Pascal Leroy, Vincent Réquillart, and Louis-Georges Soler, “Fish in Climate-Friendly and Healthy Diets”, Marine Resource Economics, vol. 33, n. 4, 2018, pp. 309–330.
See also
Published in
Marine Resource Economics, vol. 33, n. 4, 2018, pp. 309–330