Résumé
Multi-product retailers competing with smaller retailers can exercise market power by pricing below cost products also offered by smaller rivals. Loss-leading is not a predatory strategy: rather pro-competitive justifications are invoked. Unlike standard textbook models, we show that positive market value, that is, consumer valuation larger than production cost, is not required in this line of research examining the phenomenon of loss-leading. Multi-product retailers can supply products offering negative market value. We use this insight to revisit some classic issues in vertical relations.
Mots-clés
Multi-product retailers, loss-leading; negative consumer value;
Codes JEL
- L13: Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
- L81: Retail and Wholesale Trade • e-Commerce
Remplace
Stéphane Caprice et Shiva Shekhar, « Negative consumer value and loss leading », TSE Working Paper, n° 17-835, août 2017.
Référence
Stéphane Caprice et Shiva Shekhar, « Negative market value and loss leading », Economics Bulletin, vol. 39, n° 1, janvier 2019, p. 94–103.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
Economics Bulletin, vol. 39, n° 1, janvier 2019, p. 94–103