Quality standards versus nutritional taxes: Health and welfare impacts with strategic firms

Résumé

The goal of this paper is to better understand firms' strategic reactions to nutritional policies targeting food quality improvements and to derive optimal policies. We propose a model of product differentiation, taking into account the taste and health characteristics of products. We study how two firms react to alternative policies: an MQS policy, linear taxation of the two goods on the market, and taxation of the lowquality good. The MQS and the taxation of the low-quality product are the preferred options by a social planner. If taste is moderately important, the MQS policy is chosen by a populist and a paternalist social planner. If taste is a major component of choice, the populist planner chooses to tax the low-quality product whereas the paternalist planner prefers the MQS policy. Finally, for a paternalist social planner, an MQS-based policy always allows for higher levels of welfare than an information policy alone.

Mots-clés

Codes JEL

Remplace

Vincent Réquillart, Louis-Georges Soler et Yu Zang, « Quality standards versus nutritional taxes: Health and welfare impacts with strategic firms », TSE Working Paper, n° 15-594, 3 septembre 2015, révision septembre 2016.

Référence

Vincent Réquillart, Louis-Georges Soler et Yu Zang, « Quality standards versus nutritional taxes: Health and welfare impacts with strategic firms », Journal of Health Economics, vol. 50, décembre 2016, p. 268–285.