Résumé
This study examines the effect on respondents' willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk by the order of the questions in a stated preference study. Using answers from an experiment conducted on a Swedish sample where respondents’ cognitive ability was measured and where they participate in a contingent valuation survey it is found that scale sensitivity is the strongest when respondents are asked about a smaller risk reduction first (“Bottom-up” approach). This contradicts some previous evidence in the literature. It is also found that the respondents’ cognitive ability is more important for showing scale sensitivity when respondents are asked about a larger risk reduction first (“Top-down” approach), also reinforcing the result that a “Bottom-up” approach is more consistent with answers in line with theoretical predictions for a larger part of respondents.
Mots-clés
Cognitive ability; Contingent valuation; Mortality risk; Order effect; Scale sensitivity;
Codes JEL
- D80: General
- I10: General
- Q51: Valuation of Environmental Effects
Remplace
Henrik Andersson et Mikael Svensson, « Scale Sensitivity and Question Order in the Contingent Valuation Method », avril 2010.
Référence
Henrik Andersson et Mikael Svensson, « Scale Sensitivity and Question Order in the Contingent Valuation Method », Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 57, n° 11, 2014, p. 1746–1761.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 57, n° 11, 2014, p. 1746–1761