Résumé
In this paper, we provide reviews of recent scientific findings on health effects and preference valuation of health risks related to pesticides, and the role of benefit‐cost analysis in policies related to pesticides. Our reviews reveal that whereas the focus of the health literature has been on individuals with direct exposure to pesticides, e.g. farmers, the literature on preference elicitation has focused on those with indirect exposure, e.g. consumers. Our discussion of pesticides policies emphasizes the need to clarify the rationale for regulation and the role of risk perceptions in benefit‐cost analysis, and stress the importance of inter‐disciplinary research in this area.
Mots-clés
Benefit‐cost analysis; Health; Pesticides; Willingness to Pay;
Remplace
Henrik Andersson, Damian Tago et Nicolas Treich, « Pesticides and health: A review of evidence on health effects, valuation of risks, and benefit‐cost analysis », TSE Working Paper, n° 14-477, mars 2014.
Référence
Damian Tago, Henrik Andersson et Nicolas Treich, « Pesticides and health: A review of evidence on health effects, valuation of risks, and benefit‐cost analysis », dans Preference Measurement in Health : Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, vol. 24, 2014, p. 203–295.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
Preference Measurement in Health : Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, vol. 24, 2014, p. 203–295