Résumé
We analyze the effects of Geographical Indication (GI) labeling on quality choices and welfare with two vertically differentiated goods, one labelable, the other not. We consider two attributes of these goods: gustatory quality and geographical origin. We investigate two extreme cases of the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) label: a denomination standard, which guarantees only the origin of the product, without any requirement on production specifications; and a minimum quality requirement, which guarantees both the origin and the quality of the product. We find that the PDO good is not necessarily the high-quality good. When it is, the introduction of the denomination standard causes its quality to decrease. Binding production specifications that maintain the quality level of the labeled good adversely affect the PDO firm.
Codes JEL
- D21: Firm Behavior: Theory
- L13: Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
- L15: Information and Product Quality • Standardization and Compatibility
- Q13: Agricultural Markets and Marketing • Cooperatives • Agribusiness
Remplacé par
Marion Desquilbet et Sylvette Monier-Dilhan, « Are geographical indications a worthy quality label? A framework with endogenous quality choice », European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 42, 2015, p. 129–150.
Référence
Marion Desquilbet et Sylvette Monier-Dilhan, « Are geographical indications a worthy quality label? A framework with endogenous quality choice », TSE Working Paper, n° 11-263, décembre 2011, révision juin 2012.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 11-263, décembre 2011, révision juin 2012