Résumé
Blockchains are distributed ledgers, operated within peer-to-peer networks. If reliable and stable, they could offer a new, cost effective way to record transactions, but are they? We model the proof-of-work blockchain protocol as a stochastic game and analyse the equilibrium strategies of rational, strategic miners. Mining the longest chain is a Markov perfect equilibrium, without forking, in line with Nakamoto (2008). The blockchain protocol, however, is a coordination game, with multiple equilibria. There exist equilibria with forks, leading to orphaned blocks and persistent divergence between chains. We also show how forks can be generated by information delays and software upgrades. Last we identify negative externalities implying that equilibrium investment in computing capacity is excessive.
Mots-clés
blockchain; forks; proof-of-work; distributed ledger; multiplicity of equilibria; coordination game;
Codes JEL
- C73: Stochastic and Dynamic Games • Evolutionary Games • Repeated Games
- G2: Financial Institutions and Services
- L86: Information and Internet Services • Computer Software
Remplacé par
Bruno Biais, Christophe Bisière, Matthieu Bouvard et Catherine Casamatta, « The blockchain folk theorem », The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 32, n° 5, mai 2019, p. 1662–1715.
Référence
Bruno Biais, Christophe Bisière, Matthieu Bouvard et Catherine Casamatta, « The blockchain folk theorem », TSE Working Paper, n° 17-817, mai 2017, révision janvier 2018.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 17-817, mai 2017, révision janvier 2018