Document de travail

Measuring Gender and Religious Bias in the Indian Judiciary

Elliott Ash, Sam Asher, Aditi Bhowmick, Sandeep Bhupatiraju, Daniel L. Chen, Tatanya Devi, Christoph Goessmann, Paul Novosad et Bilal Siddiqi

Résumé

We study judicial in-group bias in Indian criminal courts, collecting data on over 80 million legal case records from 2010–2018. We exploit quasi-random assignment of judges and changes in judge cohorts to examine whether defendant outcomes are affected by being assigned to a judge with a similar religious or gender identity. We estimate tight zero effects of in-group bias. The upper end of our 95% confidence interval rejects effect sizes that are one-fifth of those in most of the prior literature.

Codes JEL

  • J15: Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants • Non-labor Discrimination
  • J16: Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
  • K4: Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
  • O12: Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

Référence

Elliott Ash, Sam Asher, Aditi Bhowmick, Sandeep Bhupatiraju, Daniel L. Chen, Tatanya Devi, Christoph Goessmann, Paul Novosad et Bilal Siddiqi, « Measuring Gender and Religious Bias in the Indian Judiciary », TSE Working Paper, n° 22-1395, décembre 2022.

Voir aussi

Publié dans

TSE Working Paper, n° 22-1395, décembre 2022