Document de travail

Measuring regret theory in the health and financial domain

Henrik Andersson, Henrik Scholtz et Jiakun Zheng

Résumé

This paper applies an experimental design developed by Bleichrodt et al. (2010) to test the key assumption of original regret theory (Loomes and Sugden, 1982): convexity of the regret function. We elicit preferences for financial and health outcomes for about 1,000 subjects, yielding some evidence of minor dierences between financial domain and health domain. While aggregate results seem to support regret theory at first sight, individual-level analyses show that the majority of subjects violate the predictions of regret theory with a convex regret function. Our results thus challenge the predictive accuracy of regret theory as a descriptive theory of decision-making under risk.

Mots-clés

Original regret theory; Decision under uncertainty; Utility measurement; Online experiments;

Codes JEL

  • C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior
  • D81: Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

Référence

Henrik Andersson, Henrik Scholtz et Jiakun Zheng, « Measuring regret theory in the health and financial domain », TSE Working Paper, n° 23-1449, juin 2023.

Voir aussi

Publié dans

TSE Working Paper, n° 23-1449, juin 2023