Résumé
This paper studies how to combine screening menus and inspection in mechanism design. A Principal procures a good from an Agent whose cost is his private information. The Principal has three instruments: screening menus —i.e., quantities and transfers — and (ex-ante) inspection. Inspection is costly but reveals the Agent’s cost. The combination of inspection and screening menus mitigates inefficiencies: the optimal mechanism procures an efficient quantity from all Agents whose cost of production is sufficiently low, regardless of whether inspection has taken place. However, quantity distortions still necessarily occur in optimal regulation; the quantity procured from Agents with higher production costs is inefficiently low. Both results are true regardless of the magnitude of inspection costs. In contrast to settings without inspection, incentive compatibility con-straints do not bind locally. This paper provides a method to address this challenge, characterizing which constraints bind.
Mots-clés
Mechanism Design; Verification; Principal-Agent; Inspection, Procurement;
Codes JEL
- D82: Asymmetric and Private Information • Mechanism Design
- D86: Economics of Contract: Theory
- L51: Economics of Regulation
Référence
Amirreza Ahmadzadeh et Stephan Waizmann, « Mechanism Design with Costly Inspection », TSE Working Paper, n° 24-1533, mai 2024, révision septembre 2024.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 24-1533, mai 2024, révision septembre 2024