The Discounting Premium Puzzle: Survey evidence from professional economists

Abstract

We survey the attitude towards the risk-adjustment of efficient discount rates among the economics profession. Three-fourth of our respondents recommend adjusting discount rates to the risk profile of the project under scrutiny, in clear opposition to the standard practice of using a single discount rate in most public administrations around the world. For example, on average, respondents recommend using a larger discount rate for railway infrastructures than for hospitals and climate mitigation. We also observe that the degree of discounting discrimination between obviously different risk profiles remains rather limited in our sample. This generates a ”discounting premium puzzle”: economic experts want to penalize risky public projects much less than financial markets do for private investments. Finally, among experts supporting a single discount rate, there is no consensus about whether it should be based on the average cost of capital in the economy, the sovereign borrowing cost, or the Ramsey rule, yielding disagreement on its level.

Keywords

JEL codes

Replaced by

Christian Gollier, Frederick van der Ploeg, and Jiakun Zheng, “The Discounting Premium Puzzle: Survey evidence from professional economists”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 122, October 2023.

Reference

Christian Gollier, Frederick van der Ploeg, and Jiakun Zheng, “The Discounting Premium Puzzle: Survey evidence from professional economists”, TSE Working Paper, n. 22-1345, June 2022.