Résumé
We study the case in which a library consortium increases the aggregate payoff of the member libraries. We find that libraries with similar preferences are likely to lose from building a consortium and that those with diverse preferences are likely to gain by doing so. Combining libraries with diverse preferences implies that their valuation for different publishers' journals is more symmetric, which intensifies competition among publishers for scarce combined budgets. A tension between short term and long term considerations might generate a ‘library consortium trap.’ Our insight can be applied to other buyer groups as long as competition is generated by buyers' budget constraints.
Remplace
Doh-Shin Jeon et Domenico Menicucci, « The Benefits of Diverse Preferences in Library Consortia », TSE Working Paper, n° 13-425, 21 août 2013, révision décembre 2015.
Référence
Doh-Shin Jeon et Domenico Menicucci, « The Benefits of Diverse Preferences in Library Consortia », The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 65, n° 1, mars 2017, p. 105–135.
Publié dans
The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 65, n° 1, mars 2017, p. 105–135